ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Performance discrepancy mitigation in heart disease prediction for multisensory inter-datasets.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improved Inception-Capsule deep learning model with enhanced feature selection for early prediction of heart disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Leveraging textual information for social media news categorization and sentiment analysis.PloS one · 2024Article
- Terrorism group prediction using feature combination and BiGRU with self-attention mechanism.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart disease is one of the primary causes of morbidity and death worldwide. Millions of people have had heart attacks every year, and only early-stage predictions can help to reduce the number. Researchers are working on designing and developing early-stage prediction systems using different advanced technologies, and machine learning (ML) is one of them. Almost all existing ML-based works consider the same dataset (intra-dataset) for the training and validation of their method. In particular, they do not consider inter-dataset performance checks, where different datasets are used in the training and testing phases. In inter-dataset setup, existing ML models show a poor performance named the inter-dataset discrepancy problem. This work focuses on mitigating the inter-dataset discrepancy problem by considering five available heart disease datasets and their combined form. All potential training and testing mode combinations are systematically executed to assess discrepancies before and after applying the proposed methods. Imbalance data handling using SMOTE-Tomek, feature selection using random forest (RF), and feature extraction using principle component analysis (PCA) with a long preprocessing pipeline are used to mitigate the inter-dataset discrepancy problem. The preprocessing pipeline builds on missing value handling using RF regression, log transformation, outlier removal, normalization, and data balancing that convert the datasets to more ML-centric. Support vector machine, K-nearest neighbors, decision tree, RF, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, Gaussian naive Bayes, logistic regression, and multilayer perceptron are used as classifiers. Experimental results show that feature selection and classification using RF produce better results than other combination strategies in both single- and inter-dataset setups. In certain configurations of individual datasets, RF demonstrates 100% accuracy and 96% accuracy during the feature selection phase in an inter-dataset setup, exhibiting commendable precision, recall, F1 score, specificity, and AUC score. The results indicate that an effective preprocessing technique has the potential to improve the performance of the ML model without necessitating the development of intricate prediction models. Addressing inter-dataset discrepancies introduces a novel research avenue, enabling the amalgamation of identical features from various datasets to construct a comprehensive global dataset within a specific domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.