Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38660190›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

Semi or fully automatic tooth segmentation in CBCT images: a review.

Qianhan Zheng, Yu Gao, Mengqi Zhou, Huimin Li, Jiaqi Lin, Weifang Zhang, Xuepeng Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Performance assessment of five artificial intelligence-based algorithms for automated tooth segmentation and labeling on intraoral scans.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qianhan ZhengStomatology Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yu GaoStomatology Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Mengqi ZhouStomatology Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Huimin LiStomatology Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jiaqi LinStomatology Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Weifang ZhangStomatology Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xuepeng ChenStomatology Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is widely employed in modern dentistry, and tooth segmentation constitutes an integral part of the digital workflow based on these imaging data. Previous methodologies rely heavily on manual segmentation and are time-consuming and labor-intensive in clinical practice. Recently, with advancements in computer vision technology, scholars have conducted in-depth research, proposing various fast and accurate tooth segmentation methods. In this review, we review 55 articles in this field and discuss the effectiveness, advantages, and disadvantages of each approach. In addition to simple classification and discussion, this review aims to reveal how tooth segmentation methods can be improved by the application and refinement of existing image segmentation algorithms to solve problems such as irregular morphology and fuzzy boundaries of teeth. It is assumed that with the optimization of these methods, manual operation will be reduced, and greater accuracy and robustness in tooth segmentation will be achieved. Finally, we highlight the challenges that still exist in this field and provide prospects for future directions.

Indexed as

CBCTDeep learningLevel setTooth segmentationUNet

Identifiers

PMID38660190
PMCPMC11041986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.