Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38660176›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

What are developers talking about information security? A large-scale study using semantic analysis of Q&A posts.

Fatih Gurcan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fatih GurcanDepartment of Management Information Systems, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Digitalization and rapid technological improvement in the present day bring numerous benefits, but they also raise the complexity and diversity of cyber security risks, putting critical information security issues on the agenda. Growing issues and worries about information security endanger not only the security of individuals and organizations but also global social and economic stability. Methods: This study investigates the issues and challenges regarding information security by analyzing all the postings on ISSE (Information Security Stack Exchange), a Q&A website focused on information security. In order to identify the primary topics addressed in postings shared on the ISSE platform, we employed a probabilistic topic modeling method called latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), which is generative in nature and relies on unsupervised machine learning processes. Results: Through this investigation, a total of 38 topics were identified, demonstrating the present state of information security issues and challenges. Considering these topics, a comprehensive taxonomy of seven categories was devised to address information security issues, taking into account their backgrounds and perspectives. Subsequently, we conducted an examination of the prevalence and complexity of the matters at hand. In addition, we have defined the prevailing technologies utilized in the realm of information security, including tasks, certifications, standards, methods, tools, threats, and defenses. We have provided a number of implications for different stakeholders, including academics, developers, educators, and practitioners, who are working towards advancing the field of information security.

Indexed as

Empirical studyInformation securityQ&A communitiesSemantic analysisTopic modeling

Identifiers

PMID38660176
PMCPMC11041951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.