Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38660169›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

The effect of hair removal and filtering on melanoma detection: a comparative deep learning study with AlexNet CNN.

Angélica Quishpe-Usca, Stefany Cuenca-Dominguez, Araceli Arias-Viñansaca, Karen Bosmediano-Angos, Fernando Villalba-Meneses, Lenin Ramírez-Cando, Andrés Tirado-Espín, Carolina Cadena-Morejón, Diego Almeida-Galárraga, Cesar Guevara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angélica Quishpe-Usca *School of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, San Miguel de Urcuquí, Imbabura, Ecuador.
Stefany Cuenca-DominguezSchool of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, San Miguel de Urcuquí, Imbabura, Ecuador.
Araceli Arias-ViñansacaSchool of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, San Miguel de Urcuquí, Imbabura, Ecuador.
Karen Bosmediano-AngosSchool of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, San Miguel de Urcuquí, Imbabura, Ecuador.
Fernando Villalba-MenesesSchool of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, San Miguel de Urcuquí, Imbabura, Ecuador.
Lenin Ramírez-CandoSchool of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, San Miguel de Urcuquí, Imbabura, Ecuador.
Andrés Tirado-EspínSchool of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, Yachay Tech University, San Miguel de Urcuquí, Imbabura, Ecuador.
Carolina Cadena-MorejónSchool of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, Yachay Tech University, San Miguel de Urcuquí, Imbabura, Ecuador.
Diego Almeida-GalárragaSchool of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, San Miguel de Urcuquí, Imbabura, Ecuador.
Cesar Guevara *Quantitative Methods Department, CUNEF Universidad, Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Yachay Tech · ECCUNEF Universidad

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanoma is the most aggressive and prevalent form of skin cancer globally, with a higher incidence in men and individuals with fair skin. Early detection of melanoma is essential for the successful treatment and prevention of metastasis. In this context, deep learning methods, distinguished by their ability to perform automated and detailed analysis, extracting melanoma-specific features, have emerged. These approaches excel in performing large-scale analysis, optimizing time, and providing accurate diagnoses, contributing to timely treatments compared to conventional diagnostic methods. The present study offers a methodology to assess the effectiveness of an AlexNet-based convolutional neural network (CNN) in identifying early-stage melanomas. The model is trained on a balanced dataset of 10,605 dermoscopic images, and on modified datasets where hair, a potential obstructive factor, was detected and removed allowing for an assessment of how hair removal affects the model's overall performance. To perform hair removal, we propose a morphological algorithm combined with different filtering techniques for comparison: Fourier, Wavelet, average blur, and low-pass filters. The model is evaluated through 10-fold cross-validation and the metrics of accuracy, recall, precision, and the F1 score. The results demonstrate that the proposed model performs the best for the dataset where we implemented both a Wavelet filter and hair removal algorithm. It has an accuracy of 91.30%, a recall of 87%, a precision of 95.19%, and an F1 score of 90.91%.

Indexed as

CancerClassificationDeep-learningDermoscopicDetectionImageMelanomaNeural networkPre-processing

Identifiers

PMID38660169
PMCPMC11041978
OpenAlexW4394848549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.