Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38660148›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

Enhancing brain tumor diagnosis: an optimized CNN hyperparameter model for improved accuracy and reliability.

Abdullah A Asiri, Ahmad Shaf, Tariq Ali, Muhammad Aamir, Muhammad Irfan, Saeed Alqahtani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abdullah A AsiriRadiological Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Najran University, Najran, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad ShafDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Sahiwal, Punjan, Pakistan.
Tariq AliDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Sahiwal, Punjan, Pakistan.
Muhammad AamirDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Sahiwal, Punjan, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-0580-3921
Muhammad IrfanElectrical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Najran University, Najran, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Saeed AlqahtaniRadiological Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Najran University, Najran, Najran, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperparameter tuning plays a pivotal role in the accuracy and reliability of convolutional neural network (CNN) models used in brain tumor diagnosis. These hyperparameters exert control over various aspects of the neural network, encompassing feature extraction, spatial resolution, non-linear mapping, convergence speed, and model complexity. We propose a meticulously refined CNN hyperparameter model designed to optimize critical parameters, including filter number and size, stride padding, pooling techniques, activation functions, learning rate, batch size, and the number of layers. Our approach leverages two publicly available brain tumor MRI datasets for research purposes. The first dataset comprises a total of 7,023 human brain images, categorized into four classes: glioma, meningioma, no tumor, and pituitary. The second dataset contains 253 images classified as "yes" and "no." Our approach delivers exceptional results, demonstrating an average 94.25% precision, recall, and F1-score with 96% accuracy for dataset 1, while an average 87.5% precision, recall, and F1-score, with accuracy of 88% for dataset 2. To affirm the robustness of our findings, we perform a comprehensive comparison with existing techniques, revealing that our method consistently outperforms these approaches. By systematically fine-tuning these critical hyperparameters, our model not only enhances its performance but also bolsters its generalization capabilities. This optimized CNN model provides medical experts with a more precise and efficient tool for supporting their decision-making processes in brain tumor diagnosis.

Indexed as

Brain tumor diagnosisDecision-making processesFeature extractionHyperparameter tuningModel complexityOptimization techniquesSpatial resolution

Identifiers

PMID38660148
PMCPMC11041936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.