ArticleMethodsX2024
Modified turbidometric microassay for the measurement of sulfate in plasma and urine.
Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analytical methods for quantitating sulfate in plasma and serum.Essays in biochemistry · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sulfate is the fourth most abundant anion in circulation. Despite being an essential nutrient for healthy growth and development, sulfate is not routinely measured in clinical settings. In research settings, animal studies have shown that hyposulfatemia and hypersulfaturia are associated with adverse developmental outcomes. Those findings have increased interest in measuring plasma and urine sulfate levels. In this study, we describe a modified assay to measure sulfate in low volumes of plasma and urine. •A streamlined microassay to measure sulfate levels using a microtiter plate format was developed.•To determine the robustness of the assay, this method assessed reagent stability and concentrations, as well as absorbance at different wavelengths and following a range of incubation times.•The optimized microassay was used to measure sulfate level in pig plasma and urine samples, which were compared to a validated ion chromatography method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.