Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38660031›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

High-throughput Soxhlet extraction method applied for analysis of leaf lignocellulose and non-structural substances.

Alejandra Torres-Rodriguez, Roshanak Darvishzadeh, Andrew K Skidmore, Erna Fränzel-Luiten, Benno Knaken, Boelo Schuur

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A deep dive into herbal extraction: Techniques, trends, and technological advancements.South African journal of botany : official journal of the South African Association of Botanists = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir plantkunde : amptelike tydskrif van die Suid-Afrikaanse Genootskap van Plantkundiges · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alejandra Torres-RodriguezDepartment of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, P.O. box 217, Enschede 7500 AE, the Netherlands.
Roshanak DarvishzadehDepartment of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, P.O. box 217, Enschede 7500 AE, the Netherlands.
Andrew K SkidmoreDepartment of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, P.O. box 217, Enschede 7500 AE, the Netherlands.
Erna Fränzel-LuitenSustainable Process Technology Group, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, P.O. box 217, Enschede 7500 AE, the Netherlands.
Benno KnakenSustainable Process Technology Group, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, P.O. box 217, Enschede 7500 AE, the Netherlands.
Boelo SchuurSustainable Process Technology Group, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, P.O. box 217, Enschede 7500 AE, the Netherlands.
University of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The traditional Soxhlet extraction method is commonly employed to extract soluble components from non-soluble components in a solid matrix, for example, non-structural substances in biomass samples that can be separated from structural lignocellulosic compounds in biomass samples. Conventional laboratory procedures for such extractions typically involve a low sample throughput, with each run being performed individually, resulting in time-consuming and labour-intensive processes, making them impractical for analysing large sample sets. In research fields such as Earth Observation in Forest Ecosystems, extensive fieldwork sampling is required across large study areas, resulting in a substantial number of leaf samples, each with limited mass. In this study, an innovative adaptation of the conventional National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Soxhlet method is developed to create a high-throughput mini-Soxhlet apparatus that enables the simultaneous extraction of up to nineteen samples, each with a mass of 0.3 g per sample. With this adaptation, we measured the lignocellulose and extractive in 343 leaf samples collected from four temperate forest tree species. This modified approach enhances versatility and can be applied to all solid-liquid extractions and various types of vegetation tissues, such as tree leaves, shrubs, crops, feedstock, and other non-woody samples.•The solid-liquid extraction method has been implemented in a heating block facilitating 19 small flasks to measure multiple samples simultaneously while requiring only a small sample mass.•The apparatus set-up was constructed using an alumina heating block mounted on a standard laboratory heating plate. Boiling flask tubes were placed in the heating block and equipped with condenser caps and filters on glass rods on which the solid samples were placed.•The adjustments made the method suitable for application to diverse vegetation tissues and non-woody sample types. It holds particular appeal for research areas that necessitate a high sample number.

Indexed as

High throughput mini Soxhlet apparatusLeaf samplesNon-structural substancesVegetation tissue

Identifiers

PMID38660031
PMCPMC11041828
OpenAlexW4392580892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.