Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38660030›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

Mix-method toolbox for monitoring greenhouse gas production and microbiome responses to soil amendments.

Késia Silva Lourenço, Afnan Khalil Ahmad Suleiman, Agata Pijl, Mauricio R Dimitrov, Heitor Cantarella, Eiko Eurya Kuramae

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Késia Silva LourençoMicrobial Ecology Department, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, Wageningen 6708, PB, The Netherlands.
Afnan Khalil Ahmad SuleimanMicrobial Ecology Department, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, Wageningen 6708, PB, The Netherlands.
Agata PijlMicrobial Ecology Department, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, Wageningen 6708, PB, The Netherlands.
Mauricio R DimitrovMicrobial Ecology Department, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, Wageningen 6708, PB, The Netherlands.
Heitor CantarellaSoils and Environmental Resources Center, Agronomic Institute of Campinas (IAC), Av. Barão de Itapura 1481, Campinas 13020-902, SP, Brazil.
Eiko Eurya KuramaeMicrobial Ecology Department, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, Wageningen 6708, PB, The Netherlands.
Netherlands Institute of Ecology · NLAgronomical Institute of Campinas · BRUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we adopt an interdisciplinary approach, integrating agronomic field experiments with soil chemistry, molecular biology techniques, and statistics to investigate the impact of organic residue amendments, such as vinasse (a by-product of sugarcane ethanol production), on soil microbiome and greenhouse gas (GHG) production. The research investigates the effects of distinct disturbances, including organic residue application alone or combined with inorganic N fertilizer on the environment. The methods assess soil microbiome dynamics (composition and function), GHG emissions, and plant productivity. Detailed steps for field experimental setup, soil sampling, soil chemical analyses, determination of bacterial and fungal community diversity, quantification of genes related to nitrification and denitrification pathways, measurement and analysis of gas fluxes (N

Indexed as

Bacterial communityCarbon dioxideClimate changeCo-occurrence of fungal and bacteriaDynamics of soil microbiomeFungal communityGas measurementGlobal warmingInterdisciplinary methods used to assess the impact of organic residues on various environmental components (soil, atmosphere, and plants). The methods are:I. Soil DNA sequencing and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR),II. Bioinformatic and statistical analyses,III. Greenhouse gases (GHG) sampling and GHG chromatography analysis,IV.Plant biomass determinationMethaneNext generation sequencing (NGS)Nitrous oxideOrganic residuesQuantitative real-time PCR (QPCR)Resistance and resilienceSoil disturbancesSustainabilityTime-series analysesVinasse

Identifiers

PMID38660030
PMCPMC11041840
OpenAlexW4394866259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.