ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Robust self-supervised denoising of voltage imaging data using CellMincer.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Voltage imaging enables high-throughput investigation of neuronal activity, yet its utility is often constrained by a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Conventional denoising algorithms, such as those based on matrix factorization, impose limiting assumptions about the noise process and the spatiotemporal structure of the signal. While deep learning based denoising techniques offer greater adaptability, existing approaches fail to fully exploit the fast temporal dynamics and unique short- and long-range dependencies within voltage imaging datasets. Here, we introduce CellMincer, a novel self-supervised deep learning method designed specifically for denoising voltage imaging datasets. CellMincer operates on the principle of masking and predicting sparse sets of pixels across short temporal windows and conditions the denoiser on precomputed spatiotemporal auto-correlations to effectively model long-range dependencies without the need for large temporal denoising contexts. We develop and utilize a physics-based simulation framework to generate realistic datasets for rigorous hyperparameter optimization and ablation studies, highlighting the key role of conditioning the denoiser on precomputed spatiotemporal auto-correlations to achieve 3-fold further reduction in noise. Comprehensive benchmarking on both simulated and real voltage imaging datasets, including those with paired patch-clamp electrophysiology (EP) as ground truth, demonstrates CellMincer's state-of-the-art performance. It achieves substantial noise reduction across the entire frequency spectrum, enhanced detection of subthreshold events, and superior cross-correlation with ground-truth EP recordings. Finally, we demonstrate how CellMincer's addition to a typical voltage imaging data analysis workflow improves neuronal segmentation, peak detection, and ultimately leads to significantly enhanced separation of functional phenotypes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.