ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
DNA methylation differences between the female and male X chromosomes in human brain.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of prenatal environmental exposure on offspring neurodevelopment and susceptibility to neurodegenerative diseases: mechanisms and perspectives.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Sex differences in endothelial cell biology: cellular phenotypes and molecular regulators.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanisms of X chromosome inactivation suggest fundamental epigenetic differences between the female and male X chromosomes. However, DNA methylation studies often exclude the X chromosomes. In addition, many previous studies relied on techniques that examine non-randomly selected subsets of positions such as array-based methods, rather than assessing the whole X chromosome. Consequently, our understanding of X chromosome DNA methylation lags behind that of autosomes. Here we addressed this gap of knowledge by studying X chromosome DNA methylation using 89 whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) maps from neurons and oligodendrocytes. Using this unbiased and comprehensive data, we show that DNA methylation of the female X chromosomes is globally reduced (hypomethylated) across the entire chromosome compared to the male X chromosomes and autosomes. On the other hand, the majority of X-linked promoters were more highly methylated (hypermethylated) in females compared to males, consistent with the role of DNA methylation in X chromosome inactivation and dosage compensation. Remarkably, hypermethylation of female X promoters was limited to a group of previously lowly methylated promoters. The other group of highly methylated promoters were both hyper- and hypo-methylated in females with no obvious association with gene expression. Therefore, X chromosome inactivation by DNA methylation was exclusive to a subset of promoters with distinctive epigenetic feature. Apart from this group of promoters, differentially methylated regions in the female and male X chromosomes were dominated by female hypomethylation. Our study furthers the understanding of X-chromosome dosage regulation by DNA methylation on the chromosomal level as well as on individual gene level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.