ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Precision and Accuracy in Quantitative Measurement of Gene Expression from Single-Cell/Nuclei RNA Sequencing Data.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell and single-nucleus RNA sequencing (sc/snRNA-Seq) have become essential tools for profiling gene expression across different cell types in biomedical research. While factors like RNA integrity, cell count, and sequencing depth are known to influence data quality, quantitative benchmarks and actionable guidelines are lacking. This gap contributes to variability in study designs and inconsistencies in downstream analyses. In this study, we systematically evaluated quantitative precision and accuracy in expression measures across 23 sc/snRNA-Seq datasets comprising 3,682,576 cells from 339 samples. Precision was assessed using technical replicates based on pseudo-bulks created from subsampling. Accuracy was evaluated using sample-matched scRNA-Seq and pooled-cell RNA-Seq data of mononuclear phagocytes from four species. Our results show that precision and accuracy are generally low at the single-cell level, with reproducibility being strongly influenced by cell count and RNA quality. We establish data-driven thresholds for optimizing study design, recommending at least 500 cells per cell type per individual to achieve reliable quantification. Furthermore, we show that signal-to-noise ratio is a key metric for identifying reproducible differentially expressed genes. To support future research, we developed VICE (Variability In single-Cell gene Expressions), a tool that evaluates sc/snRNA-seq data quality and estimates the true positive rate of differential expression results based on sample size, observed noise levels, and expected effect size. These findings provide practical, evidence-based guidelines to enhance the reliability and reproducibility of sc/snRNA-seq studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.