ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Pushing the Isotopic Envelope: When carrier channels pollute their neighbors' signals.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Individual cells are the foundational unit of biology, and understanding their functions and interactions is critical to advancing our understanding of health and disease. Single cell proteomics has seen intense interest from mass spectrometrists, with a goal of quantifying the proteome of single cells by adapting current techniques used in bulk samples. To date, most method optimizations research has worked towards increasing the proteome coverage of single cells. One prominent technique multiplexes many individual cells into a single data acquisition event using isobaric labels. Accompanying the single cells, one label is typically used for a mixed set of many cells, called a carrier or boost channel. Although this improves peptide identification rates, several groups have examined the impact on quantitative accuracy as more cells are included in the carrier channel, e.g. 100x or 500x. This manuscript explores how impurities in the multiplexing reagent can lead to inaccurate quantification observed as a measurable signal in the wrong channel. We discover that the severe abundance differential between carrier and single cell, combined with the reagent impurities, can overshadow several channels typically used for single cells. For carrier amounts 100x and above, this contamination can be as abundant as true signal from a single cell. Therefore, we suggest limiting the carrier channel to a minimal amount and balance the goals of identification and quantification.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.