ArticleResearch square2024
Systemic antibiotic treatment of cows with metritis early postpartum does not change the progression of uterine disease or the uterine microbiome at 1 month postpartum.
Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Postpartum uterine disease (metritis) is common in dairy cows. The disease develops within 1 week after calving and is associated with microbial dysbiosis, fever, and fetid uterine discharge. Cows with metritis have a greater likelihood of developing endometritis and infertility later postpartum. Antibiotic treatment is used to relieve symptoms of metritis but the capacity of antibiotic treatment to improve fertility later postpartum is inconsistent across published studies. We hypothesized that an antibiotic has only a short-term effect on the uterine microbiome and does not change the progression of disease from metritis to endometritis. To test this hypothesis, we studied the effects of systemic antibiotic given to cows diagnosed with metritis and healthy cows early postpartum on the development of endometritis and the uterine microbiome at 1 month postpartum. Results: Cows diagnosed with metritis were compared to healthy ones in a 2 × 2 factorial design, where they were either treated with an antibiotic (ceftiofur hydrochloride) at 7 to 10 days postpartum or left untreated. Cows were slaughtered at one month postpartum and the uterus was assessed for endometritis (presence of purulent material in the uterine lumen and inflammation in the endometrium) and uterine samples were collected for bacteriology and metagenomics (16S rRNA gene sequencing). As expected, the uterine microbiome at disease diagnosis had dysbiosis of typical metritis pathogens (e.g., Fusobacterium, Bacteroides, and Porphyromonas) in diseased compared with healthy cows. At one month postpartum, there was a tendency for more endometritis in metritis cows compared with healthy but antibiotic treatment had no effect on endometritis prevalence regardless of the original disease diagnosis. Likewise, when bacteria were cultured or sequenced, there were a greater number of species (culture) or amplicon sequence variants (ASV; sequencing) in the uterine lumen of cows with metritis. However, antibiotic treatment had no effect on the prevalence of cultured species or the composition of the detected ASV. The uterine microbiome at 1 month postpartum was associated with the clinical observation of the uterus (endometritis or healthy). Conclusions: Early postpartum antibiotic treatment only provides temporary resolution of uterine dysbiosis that is not sustained long-term. Failure to resolve the dysbiosis is associated with a greater prevalence of endometritis in cows with metritis, and the occurrence of endometritis significantly impacts fertility later postpartum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.