ArticleCureus2024
Exploring Solitary Fibrous Tumors at a Tertiary Cancer Center: Clinicopathological and Immunomorphologic Profile.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Depicting Characteristic Staghorn Vessels in Solitary Fibrous Tumor of the Liver With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Ultrasound Localized Microscopy: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- The management of solitary fibrous tumor: a single center's experience.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a distinct fibroblastic tumor that can occur at any anatomical site and can manifest a variety of histopathological features. NAB2-STAT6 gene fusion has recently emerged as a sensitive and specific molecular marker and its surrogate on immunohistochemistry, STAT6 has also displayed considerable efficacy. Nevertheless, its histologic diversity can result in diagnostic challenges, especially when classic features are not apparent. Methods A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary cancer centre in North India over 3 years to document the clinicopathologic and immunomorphologic profile of SFTs. Immunohistochemical analysis of BCOR and p53 were gauged additionally and patients were stratified according to Modified Demicco and Salas criteria for risk of metastasis. Results Sixteen patients of SFT were identified, affecting middle-aged men and women equally. Though lung/pleura are known to be involved commonly, SFT affects other sites such as the kidney, brain, buccal mucosa, liver, and penis as well. The majority endured localized disease while a lesser number suffered locoregional/distant spread. Two patients revealed features of a malignant profile. Risk stratification according to the Modified Demicco and Salas criteria evinced comparable results. No discernible relationship however was highlighted between the immunohistochemical expression of BCOR, p53, and any significant SFT parameter. Conclusion Although SFTs are very rare substantially benign mesenchymal neoplasms, pathologists must be conversant with their histological diversity and be vigilant of their malignant attributes. The worth of STAT6 immunohistochemistry for precise diagnosis and long-term studies for delineating clinical behavior cannot be overemphasized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.