Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38659555›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Unifying Endotracheal Intracuff-Pressure Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit: Bridging the Gap Between Standardization and Neglect.

Sankalp Yadav, Gautam Rawal

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sankalp YadavMedicine, Shri Madan Lal Khurana Chest Clinic, New Delhi, IND.
Gautam RawalRespiratory Medical Critical Care, Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endotracheal cuff-pressure monitoring is a critical component of patient care in the intensive care unit, ensuring the safety and efficacy of mechanical ventilation. Despite its importance, there remains a lack of standardized protocols regarding optimal pressure targets and documentation practices. This editorial examines the significance of endotracheal intracuff-pressure monitoring in enhancing patient outcomes, highlighting the challenges and potential solutions in clinical practice.

Indexed as

endotracheal tubeextubationintracuff pressuremechanical ventilation (mv)tracheomalaciaventilator-associated pneumonia (vap)

Identifiers

PMID38659555
PMCPMC11041519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.