ArticleJournal of animal science2024
Genomic estimated breeding values for bovine respiratory disease resistance in Angus feedlot cattle.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mapping Variability in Bovine Respiratory Disease Risk Factors in Beef Production Systems: A Scoping Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Genomic Regions Associated with Respiratory Disease in Holstein Calves in the Southern United States.Genes · 2025Article
- Application of Genomic Selection in Beef Cattle Disease Prevention.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Genomic regions associated with bovine respiratory disease in pacific northwest Holstein cattle.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) causes major losses in feedlot cattle worldwide. A genetic component for BRD resistance in feedlot cattle and calves has been reported in a number of studies, with heritabilities ranging from 0.04 to 0.2. These results suggest selection could be used to reduce the incidence of BRD. Genomic selection could be an attractive approach for breeding for BRD resistance, given the phenotype is not likely to be recorded on breeding animals. In this study, we derived GEBVs for BRD resistance and assessed their accuracy in a reasonably large data set recorded for feedlot treatment of BRD (1213 Angus steers, in two feedlots). In fivefold cross validation, genomic predictions were moderately accurate (0.23 ± 0.01) when a BayesR approach was used. Expansion of this approach to include more animals and a diversity of breeds is recommended to successfully develop a GEBV for BRD resistance in feedlots for the beef industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.