Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38659205›Full record

ArticleActa neuropsychiatrica2024

A retrospective analysis of iv ketamine outcome on hospitalisations in an unselected psychiatric sample.

Karl Sandström, Olli Kampman, Peter Asellus

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropsychiatrica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Karl SandströmDepartment of Clinical Sciences (Psychiatry), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9016-3258
Olli KampmanDepartment of Clinical Sciences (Psychiatry), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6891-2266
Peter AsellusDepartment of Clinical Sciences (Psychiatry), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Umeå University · SEUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to explore the outcome with iv ketamine treatment in a real-world clinical setting, primarily measured as posttreatment days hospitalised.

methodsThe psychiatric medical records of 46 patients having received iv ketamine on a psychiatric treatment indication between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively examined. Analysis comparing the number and duration of hospital admissions before and after ketamine treatment as well as logistic regression analysis to investigate clinical predictors of effectiveness, were performed. To assess patients' severity of depressed symptoms records were screened for MADRS-S scores.

resultsNo significant difference between pre- and posttreatment hospital days (

conclusionIv ketamine treatment showed effectiveness in reducing depressive symptoms even with complex patients in a real-world clinical setting. However, this did not translate to a reduction in hospitalisation. Highlighting the multifaceted challenges posed when implementing iv ketamine treatment in clinical practice.

Indexed as

DepressionHospitalizationKetamineAdministration, IntravenousAdultAgedAntidepressive AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsKetamineantidepressive agentsdepressive disorderKetaminemood disorderstreatment-resistant

Identifiers

PMID38659205
PMCPMC13130326
OpenAlexW4395456725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.