Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38659062›Full record

SynthesisItalian journal of pediatrics2024

Assessment of the measurement properties of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 by applying the COSMIN methodology.

Yuanye Zhu, Jiahui Hu, Weibing Ye, Mallikarjuna Korivi, Yongdong Qian

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuanye ZhuInstitute of Human Movement and Sports Engineering, College of Physical Education and Health Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, 321004, Jinhua City, Zhejiang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9947-401X
Jiahui HuInstitute of Human Movement and Sports Engineering, College of Physical Education and Health Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, 321004, Jinhua City, Zhejiang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-8878-1485
Weibing YeInstitute of Human Movement and Sports Engineering, College of Physical Education and Health Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, 321004, Jinhua City, Zhejiang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7352-5372
Mallikarjuna KoriviInstitute of Human Movement and Sports Engineering, College of Physical Education and Health Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, 321004, Jinhua City, Zhejiang, China. mallik.k5@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4038-1368
Yongdong QianInstitute of Human Movement and Sports Engineering, College of Physical Education and Health Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, 321004, Jinhua City, Zhejiang, China. tyxyqyd@zjnu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7535-7660

Funding

Jinhua Maimiao Education Technology Co., Ltd.," Zhejiang Province, China KYH06Y21383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 (PDMS-2) has been used to assess the gross and fine motor skills of children (0-6 years); however, the measurement properties of the PDMS-2 are inconclusive. Here, we aimed to systematically review the measurement properties of PDMS-2, and synthesize the quality of evidence using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurements Instruments (COSMIN) methodology. Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL and MEDLINE, were searched for relevant studies through January 2023; these studies used PDMS-2. The methodological quality of each study was assessed by the COSMIN risk-of-bias checklist, and the measurement properties of PDMS-2 were evaluated by the COSMIN quality criteria. Modified GRADE was used to evaluate the quality of the evidence. We included a total of 22 articles in the assessment. Among the assessed measurement properties, the content validity of PDMS-2 was found to be sufficient with moderate-quality evidence. The structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and interrater reliability of the PDMS-2 were sufficient for high-quality evidence, while the intrarater reliability was sufficient for moderate-quality evidence. Sufficient high-quality evidence was also found for the measurement error of PDMS-2. The overall construct validity of the PDMS-2 was sufficient but showed inconsistent quality of evidence. The responsiveness of PDMS-2 appears to be sufficient with low-quality evidence. Our findings demonstrate that the PDMS-2 has sufficient content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, reliability and measurement error with moderate to high-quality evidence. Therefore, PDMS-2 is graded as 'A' and can be used in motor development research and clinical settings.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentMotor SkillsChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornReproducibility of ResultsCOSMINMotor developmentPDMS-2ReliabilityResponsivenessValidity

Identifiers

PMID38659062
PMCPMC11044420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.