Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38658958›Full record

ArticleNutrition journal2024

Development of a sustainable diet index in US adults.

Sukyoung Jung, Heather A Young, Barbara H Braffett, Samuel J Simmens, Cynthia L Ogden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Short Questionnaire for Evaluating Mediterranean Diet Adherence and Nutritional Sustainability: Validation in Turkish Adults.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Health and Environmental Impacts of Major Foods Consumed in Regional Food Systems of Brazil.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Sukyoung JungDepartment of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA. sukyoung_jung@gwu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9200-2158
Heather A YoungDepartment of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0225-4894
Barbara H BraffettDepartment of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2184-9754
Samuel J SimmensDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7830-8003
Cynthia L OgdenDepartment of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1147-7157
Milken Institute · US

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2023-00274240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA transformation towards healthy diets through a sustainable food system is essential to enhance both human and planet health. Development of a valid, multidimensional, quantitative index of a sustainable diet would allow monitoring progress in the US population. We evaluated the content and construct validity of a sustainable diet index for US adults (SDI-US) based on data collected at the individual level.

methodsThe SDI-US, adapted from the SDI validated in the French population, was developed using data on US adults aged 20 years and older from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2018 (n = 25,543). The index consisted of 4 sub-indices, made up of 12 indicators, corresponding to 4 dimensions of sustainable diets (nutritional quality, environmental impacts, affordability (economic), and ready-made product use behaviors (sociocultural)). A higher SDI-US score indicates greater alignment with sustainable diets (range: 4-20). Validation analyses were performed, including the assessment of the relevance of each indicator, correlations between individual indicators, sub-indices, and total SDI-US, differences in scores between sociodemographic subgroups, and associations with selected food groups in dietary guidelines, the alternative Mediterranean diet (aMed) score, and the EAT-Lancet diet score.

resultsTotal SDI-US mean was 13.1 (standard error 0.04). The correlation between SDI-US and sub-indices ranged from 0.39 for the environmental sub-index to 0.61 for the economic sub-index (Pearson Correlation coefficient). The correlation between a modified SDI-US after removing each sub-index and the SDI-US ranged from 0.83 to 0.93. aMed scores and EAT-Lancet diet scores were significantly higher among adults in the highest SDI-US quintile compared to the lowest quintile (aMed: 4.6 vs. 3.2; EAT-Lancet diet score: 9.9 vs. 8.7 p < .0001 for both).

conclusionsOverall, content and construct validity of the SDI-US were acceptable. The SDI-US reflected the key features of sustainable diets by integrating four sub-indices, comparable to the SDI-France. The SDI-US can be used to assess alignment with sustainable diets in the US. Continued monitoring of US adults' diets using the SDI-US could help improve dietary sustainability.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyNutrition SurveysAdultAgedDietFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition PolicyNutritive ValueUnited StatesYoung AdultDietary patternsDiet indexEnvironmental impactMultidimensional assessmentSustainable diets

Identifiers

PMID38658958
PMCPMC11040758
OpenAlexW4395078966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.