Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38658881›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2024

Acceptability of Tele-mental Health Services Among Users: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Rowan M Abuyadek, Esraa Abdellatif Hammouda, Ehab Elrewany, Dina Hussein Elmalawany, Rasha Ashmawy, Sally Zeina, Assem Gebreal, Ramy Mohamed Ghazy

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Rowan M AbuyadekHealth Administration and Behavioral Sciences Department, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Esraa Abdellatif HammoudaClinical Research Department, El-Raml Pediatric Hospital, Ministry of Health and Population, Alexandria, Egypt.
Ehab ElrewanyTropical Health Department, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. ehabelrewany@alexu.edu.eg.
Dina Hussein ElmalawanyMiddle District of Health, Ministry of Health and Population, Alexandria, Egypt.
Rasha AshmawyDepartment of Clinical Research, Maamora Chest Hospital, MoHP, Alexandria, Egypt.
Sally ZeinaDepartment of Clinical Research, Maamora Chest Hospital, MoHP, Alexandria, Egypt.
Assem GebrealAlexandria Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Ramy Mohamed GhazyTropical Health Department, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Alexandria University · EGMinistry of Health and Population · EGHealth Affairs · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental disorders are currently a global public health concern, particularly after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Mental health services gradually transitioned to teleservices, employing various methods like texting and videoconferencing. This meta-analysis aimed mainly to quantify the acceptability of tele-mental health services among both beneficiaries and providers. Secondary objectives included quantifying the usability of and satisfaction with these services.

methodsWe conducted a systematic search of the following databases PubMed Central, SAGE, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed Medline, and EBSCO according to Preferred Reporting Items of the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines until December 2022.

resultsOut of 3366 search results, 39 studies fully met the inclusion criteria. The pooled acceptability of tele-mental health services among beneficiaries was [71.0% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 63.0 - 78.5%, I

conclusionsThe study highlighted a high acceptability of tele-mental health services. These findings suggest a promising outlook for the integration and adoption of tele-mental health services and emphasize the importance of considering user perspectives and addressing provider-specific challenges to enhance overall service delivery and effectiveness.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CareTelemedicineHumansMental DisordersPatient SatisfactionAcceptabilityHealth service usersInternet basedMental healthTelehealthTelemedicineTele-mental health

Identifiers

PMID38658881
PMCPMC11040906
OpenAlexW4395074836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.