Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38658739›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2024

The molecular determinants of microglial developmental dynamics.

Liam Barry-Carroll, Diego Gomez-Nicola

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. miR-146a-5p mitigates ethanol-induced neuroinflammation by targeting Btg2-dependent microglial activation.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Liam Barry-CarrollNutrineuro, UMR 1286 INRAE, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux INP, Bordeaux, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3683-538X
Diego Gomez-NicolaSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK. d.gomez-nicola@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5316-2682
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRSouthampton General Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P024572/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microglia constitute the largest population of parenchymal macrophages in the brain and are considered a unique subset of central nervous system glial cells owing to their extra-embryonic origins in the yolk sac. During development, microglial progenitors readily proliferate and eventually colonize the entire brain. In this Review, we highlight the origins of microglial progenitors and their entry routes into the brain and discuss the various molecular and non-molecular determinants of their fate, which may inform their specific functions. Specifically, we explore recently identified mechanisms that regulate microglial colonization of the brain, including the availability of space, and describe how the expansion of highly proliferative microglial progenitors facilitates the occupation of the microglial niche. Finally, we shed light on the factors involved in establishing microglial identity in the brain.

Indexed as

MicrogliaAnimalsBrainCell DifferentiationHumans

Identifiers

PMID38658739
OpenAlexW4395069287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.