Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38658736›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2025

Real-world experience of water vapour therapy (Rezum) in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: a retrospective single-center study.

Mathias Wolters, Martin Krastel, Thorben Winkler, Hamza Idais, Mehrdad Mazdak, Hossein Tezval, Markus A Kuczyk, Christoph-A J von Klot

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mathias WoltersDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. wolters.mathias@mh-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7440-1590
Martin KrastelDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Thorben WinklerDepartment of Urology, DIAKO Hospital Flensburg, Knuthstraße 1, 24939, Flensburg, Germany.
Hamza IdaisDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Mehrdad MazdakDepartment of Urology, St. Bernward Hospital Hildesheim, Treibestraße 9, 31134, Hildesheim, Germany.
Hossein TezvalDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Markus A KuczykDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Christoph-A J von KlotDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEDIAKO · DESt. Bernward Krankenhaus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWater vapor thermal therapy (Rezum) is a minimally invasive treatment for benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). Studies reporting urodynamic results regarding the procedure are rare. Our study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Rezum on urinary outcome parameters in a consecutive series of patients and compare urodynamic data before and after treatment.

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated all the patients treated with Rezum between 07/2017 and 12/2023 at our institution. Patients who had more than one Rezum intervention, those who were unable to void (i.e., catheter-dependent patients), and those with insufficient data were excluded from the data analysis. Descriptive outcomes, such as symptom scores (IPSS, IPSS-QoL), peak flow in uroflowmetry (Qmax), post-micturition residual urine volume (PVR), and prostate volume (PVol), were analyzed. If available, preoperative and postoperative urodynamic results were evaluated.

resultsIn total, 250 Rezum procedures were performed during the observational period. After applying the exclusion criteria, the data from 193 patients were included in the analysis. Patients achieved significant symptom relief as measured using the IPSS (46% reduction) and IPSS-QoL scores (41% reduction). Qmax improved by 4.8 ml/s, as the mean PVR significantly decreased by 50%. PVol and PSA values decreased by 30% and 27.5%, respectively. In 19/193 patients with a urodynamic evaluation, pre- and postoperative data analysis showed a significant reduction in the bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI) by approximately 70%.

conclusionsRezum is effective and can improve urinary symptoms. In appropriate patients, Rezum can significantly reduce the bladder outlet obstruction (BOO).

Indexed as

Prostatic HyperplasiaSteamWaterAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUrodynamicsSteamWater

Identifiers

PMID38658736
PMCPMC11860212
OpenAlexW4395111528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.