Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38658694›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Intrarenal pressure detection during flexible ureteroscopy with fiber optic pressure sensor system in porcine model.

Junjie Bai, Yangjian Chi, Tong Shangguan, Jun Lin, Yushi Ye, Jianfeng Huang, Yahui Wen, Rong Liu, Ru Chen, Weizhong Cai and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Junjie Bai *Department of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yangjian Chi *Department of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Tong Shangguan *Department of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Jun LinDepartment of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yushi YeDepartment of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Jianfeng HuangDepartment of Urology, Zhenghe County Hospital, Nanping, China.
Yahui WenDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Rong LiuDepartment of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Ru ChenDepartment of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Weizhong CaiDepartment of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China. caiweizhong1967@163.com.
Jianhui ChenDepartment of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China. chenjianhui1983@qq.com.
Fujian Medical University · CNUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To validate the feasibility of a fiber-optic pressure sensor-based pressure measurement device for monitoring intrarenal pressure and to analyze the effects of ureteral acess sheath (UAS) type, surgical location, perfusion flow rate, and measurement location on intrarenal pressure (IRP). The measurement deviations and response times to transient pressure changes were compared between a fiber-optic pressure sensing device and a urodynamic device IRP in an in vitro porcine kidney and in a water tank. Finally, pressure measurements were performed in anesthetized female pigs using fiber-optic pressure sensing device with different UAS, different perfusion flow rates, and different surgical positions at different renal calyces and ureteropelvic junctions (UPJ). According to our operation, the result is fiber optic pressure sensing devices are highly accurate and sensitive. Under the same conditions, IRP varied among different renal calyces and UPJ (P < 0.05). IRP was lowest at 50 ml/min and highest at 150 ml/min (P < 0.05). Surgical position had a significant effect on IRP (P < 0.05). 12/14 Fr UAS had a lower IRP than 11/13 Fr UAS. Therefore fiber optic pressure sensing devices are more advantageous for IRP measurements. In ureteroscopy, the type of ureteral sheath, the surgical position, the perfusion flow rate, and the location of the measurement all affect the intrarenal pressure value.

Indexed as

Fiber Optic TechnologyKidneyPressureUreteroscopyAnimalsFemaleOptical FibersSwineUrodynamicsFiber-opticIntrarenal pressureRenal calyxSurgical positionUreteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID38658694
PMCPMC11043377
OpenAlexW4395082401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.