ArticleEye (London, England)2024
Comparison of B-Scan ultrasonography, ultra-widefield fundus imaging, and indirect ophthalmoscopy in detecting retinal breaks in cataractous eyes.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultra‑widefield imaging for retinal breaks: is it time for a head‑to‑head comparison with preoperative examination?Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Influence of ocular biometry on peripheral retinal visualization: a comparative study of Clarus and Optos widefield imaging systems.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of B-scan kinetic ultrasonography (USG), standard ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging, and indirect ophthalmoscopy (IDO) in retinal break detection in cataractous eyes. SUBJECTS/
methodsWe consecutively enrolled 126 cataract patients (including 246 eyes) with no comorbidities that could decrease best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Three index tests (USG, nonmydriatic UWF, and mydriatic IDO) were performed preoperatively to screen for retinal breaks. One week after cataract extraction, a dilated IDO examination was repeated for the definitive diagnosis of retinal break as the reference standard. The sensitivity, specificity, Youden index (YI), and predictive values of each index test were calculated according to postoperative ophthalmoscopic findings. A deep-learning nomogram was developed to quantify the risk of retinal break presence using patients' baseline data and findings reported from preoperative ophthalmic tests.
resultsFifty-two eyes (21%) were excluded from appropriate preoperative UWF imaging because of massive lens opacity. The BCVA cutoff point with maximum YI indicating UWF applicability was 0.6 logMAR (YI = 0.3; area under curve [AUC] = 0.7). Among all 246 eyes, preoperative IDO, USG, and UWF showed fair interobserver agreement (all κ > 0.2). According to postoperative IDO findings, the index tests with the highest sensitivity and specificity were USG (100%) and preoperative IDO (99%), respectively.
conclusionsFor cataractous eyes without vision-impairing comorbidities, a BCVA better than 0.6 logMAR (Snellen acuity, 20/80) allows for appropriate nonmydriatic standard UWF imaging. In a high-volume clinic equipped with skilled ophthalmic examiners, screening with USG followed by directed IDO allows the efficient identification of retinal breaks in cataractous eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.