Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38658630›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

MRI radiomics in head and neck cancer from reproducibility to combined approaches.

Anna Corti, Stefano Cavalieri, Giuseppina Calareso, Davide Mattavelli, Marco Ravanelli, Tito Poli, Lisa Licitra, Valentina D A Corino, Luca Mainardi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anna CortiDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via Ponzio 34/5, 20133, Milan, Italy. anna.corti@polimi.it.
Stefano CavalieriHead and Neck Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppina CalaresoRadiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Davide MattavelliUnit of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Marco RavanelliUnit of Radiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Tito PoliMaxillo-Facial Surgery Division, Head and Neck Department, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Lisa LicitraHead and Neck Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Valentina D A CorinoDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via Ponzio 34/5, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Luca MainardiDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via Ponzio 34/5, 20133, Milan, Italy.

Funding

National Plan for NRRP Complementary Investments PNC0000003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical applicability of radiomics in oncology depends on its transferability to real-world settings. However, the absence of standardized radiomics pipelines combined with methodological variability and insufficient reporting may hamper the reproducibility of radiomic analyses, impeding its translation to clinics. This study aimed to identify and replicate published, reproducible radiomic signatures based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), for prognosis of overall survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. Seven signatures were identified and reproduced on 58 HNSCC patients from the DB2Decide Project. The analysis focused on: assessing the signatures' reproducibility and replicating them by addressing the insufficient reporting; evaluating their relationship and performances; and proposing a cluster-based approach to combine radiomic signatures, enhancing the prognostic performance. The analysis revealed key insights: (1) despite the signatures were based on different features, high correlations among signatures and features suggested consistency in the description of lesion properties; (2) although the uncertainties in reproducing the signatures, they exhibited a moderate prognostic capability on an external dataset; (3) clustering approaches improved prognostic performance compared to individual signatures. Thus, transparent methodology not only facilitates replication on external datasets but also advances the field, refining prognostic models for potential personalized medicine applications.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRadiomicsReproducibility of ResultsCluster analysisHead and neck squamous cell carcinomaMagnetic resonance imagingOverall survivalPrognostic modelsRadiomic features

Identifiers

PMID38658630
PMCPMC11043398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.