ArticleScientific reports2024
A multi-omics analysis-based model to predict the prognosis of low-grade gliomas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- DMBX1 expression in colon cancer and its impact on prognosis and the tumor microenvironment.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- MEOX2: a homeobox transcription factor with multifaceted biological functions and broad disease associations.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Multi-Omics Integration for Advancing Glioma Precision Medicine.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Review
- Comprehensive multi-omics and machine learning framework for glioma subtyping and precision therapeutics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sialylation-related gene signature predict prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy in low- and high-grade glioma: a PCA-based stratification study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Immune-Related Long Non-Coding RNA Signature Determines Prognosis and Immunotherapeutic Coherence in Esophageal Cancer.Cancer informatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Lower-grade gliomas (LGGs) exhibit highly variable clinical behaviors, while classic histology characteristics cannot accurately reflect the authentic biological behaviors, clinical outcomes, and prognosis of LGGs. In this study, we carried out analyses of whole exome sequencing, RNA sequencing and DNA methylation in primary vs. recurrent LGG samples, and also combined the multi-omics data to construct a prognostic prediction model. TCGA-LGG dataset was searched for LGG samples. 523 samples were used for whole exome sequencing analysis, 532 for transcriptional analysis, and 529 for DNA methylation analysis. LASSO regression was used to screen genes with significant association with LGG survival from the frequently mutated genes, differentially expressed genes, and differentially methylated genes, whereby a prediction model for prognosis of LGG was further constructed and validated. The most frequently mutated diver genes in LGGs were IDH1 (77%), TP53 (48%), ATRX (37%), etc. Top significantly up-regulated genes were C6orf15, DAO, MEOX2, etc., and top significantly down-regulated genes were DMBX1, GPR50, HMX2, etc. 2077 genes were more and 299 were less methylated in recurrent vs. primary LGG samples. Thirty-nine genes from the above analysis were included to establish a prediction model of survival, which showed that the high-score group had a very significantly shorter survival than the low-score group in both training and testing sets. ROC analysis showed that AUC was 0.817 for the training set and 0.819 for the testing set. This study will be beneficial to accurately predict the survival of LGGs to identify patients with poor prognosis to take specific treatment as early, which will help improve the treatment outcomes and prognosis of LGG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.