Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38658503›Full record

ReviewJapanese journal of radiology2024

Endometriosis, a common but enigmatic disease with many faces: current concept of pathophysiology, and diagnostic strategy.

Mayumi Takeuchi, Kenji Matsuzaki, Masafumi Harada

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Japanese journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Patient-Centred Perspectives on Diagnostic Strategies for Endometriosis: A Qualitative Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  5. Evaluating Subtypes of Endometriosis in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta) Using Clinical Findings and Immunohistochemistry.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mayumi TakeuchiDepartment of Radiology, Tokushima University, 3-18-15, Kuramoto-Cho, Tokushima, 7708503, Japan. mayumi@tokushima-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8447-7620
Kenji MatsuzakiDepartment of Radiological Technology, Tokushima Bunri University, Sanuki City, ShidoKagawa, 1314-17692193, Japan.
Masafumi HaradaDepartment of Radiology, Tokushima University, 3-18-15, Kuramoto-Cho, Tokushima, 7708503, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometriosis is a benign, common, but controversial disease due to its enigmatic etiopathogenesis and biological behavior. Recent studies suggest multiple genetic, and environmental factors may affect its onset and development. Genomic analysis revealed the presence of cancer-associated gene mutations, which may reflect the neoplastic aspect of endometriosis. The management has changed dramatically with the development of fertility-preserving, minimally invasive therapies. Diagnostic strategies based on these recent basic and clinical findings are reviewed. With a focus on the presentation of clinical cases, we discuss the imaging manifestations of endometriomas, deep endometriosis, less common site and rare site endometriosis, various complications, endometriosis-associated tumor-like lesions, and malignant transformation, with pathophysiologic conditions.

Indexed as

EndometriosisDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic ImagingFemaleHumansDeep endometriosisEndometriomaEndometriosisMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Malignant transformation

Identifiers

PMID38658503
PMCPMC11286651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.