ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024
Uncertain prediction of deformable image registration on lung CT using multi-category features and supervised learning.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- [A reweighted graph matching-based algorithm for automatic extraction of corresponding landmarks in medical images].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The assessment of deformable registration uncertainty is an important task for the safety and reliability of registration methods in clinical applications. However, it is typically done by a manual and time-consuming procedure. We propose a novel automatic method to predict registration uncertainty based on multi-category features and supervised learning. Three types of features, including deformation field statistical features, deformation field physiologically realistic features, and image similarity features, are introduced and calculated to train the random forest regressor for local registration uncertain prediction. Deformation field statistical features represent the numerical stability of registration optimization, which are correlated to the uncertainty of deformation fields; deformation field physiologically realistic features represent the biomechanical properties of organ motions, which mathematically reflect the physiological reality of deformation; image similarity features reflect the similarity between the warped image and fixed image. The multi-category features comprehensively reflect the registration uncertainty. The strategy of spatial adaptive random perturbations is also introduced to accurately simulate spatial distribution of registration uncertainty, which makes deformation field statistical features more discriminative to the uncertainty of deformation fields. Experiments were conducted on three publicly available thoracic CT image datasets. Seventeen randomly selected image pairs are used to train the random forest model, and 9 image pairs are used to evaluate the prediction model. The quantitative experiments on lung CT images show that the proposed method outperforms the baseline method for uncertain prediction of classical iterative optimization-based registration and deep learning-based registration with different registration qualities. The proposed method achieves good performance for registration uncertain prediction, which has great potential in improving the accuracy of registration uncertain prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.