SynthesisJournal of neurology2024
Outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke and thrombocytopenia: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Observational
- Cardiac intimal sarcoma presenting as basilar artery occlusion treated with tenecteplase and thrombectomy: a case report.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Characterization of the In Situ Stress State of Blood Clots in Ischemic Stroke: The Effect of Initial Conditions and Arterial Interaction.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Endovascular thrombectomy in selected patients with active cancer and thrombocytopenia: outcomes under an institutional platelet transfusion practice.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMechanical Thrombectomy (MT) has improved outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to Large Vessel Obstruction (LVO). However, there is limited data on the safety and outcomes of MT in AIS patients with thrombocytopenia. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of MT in this population.
methodsFollowing the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. Studies meeting inclusion criteria underwent rigorous risk of bias assessment using the ROBINS-I tool. We compared outcomes between patients with and without thrombocytopenia undergoing MT. Using the R software version 4.3.1, meta-analyses were conducted employing random-effect models.
resultsThis meta-analysis encompassed data from 5 studies. Thrombocytopenic AIS patients who underwent MT (n = 974) exhibited lower rates of functional independence (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.98; p = 0.030) compared to patients with normal platelet counts (n = 2036). In addition, the thrombocytopenic group experienced higher mortality as compared to the group with normal platelet counts (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.26-2.45; p < 0.001). Rates of sICH were found to be similar between groups (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.74-1.93; p = 0.456), as were rates of successful recanalization (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.47-1.87; p = 0.863). Lastly, no significant differences were observed in procedure times between thrombocytopenic and non-thrombocytopenic groups.
conclusionAs compared to patients without thrombocytopenia, thrombocytopenic AIS patients undergoing MT displayed lower functional independence and higher mortality rates, with no significant differences in sICH or successful recanalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.