ArticleInternational orthopaedics2024
Ultrasound supports clinical decision-making in determining the Sanders' skeletal maturity score of the hand.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe Sanders Scoring System has revolutionized the way we assess the remaining growth potential of the skeleton. However, because it involves radiation exposure, it must be used with caution in children. The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether the Sanders skeletal maturity score (SMS) could be accurately determined using ultrasound (U).
methodsWe took radiographs (R) of the hand and performed U of the thumb and index finger in 115 patients between six and 19 years of age who were undergoing treatment for scoliosis or limb deformities. Paediatric orthopaedic surgeons, a paediatrician, and a paediatric radiologist were evaluated the blinded images. Those classified images are based on the SMS and the Thumb Ossification Composite Index (TOCI).
resultsIntrarater reliability was high for SMS and slightly weaker for TOCI, but still significant. Interrater reliability was clear for R and weaker for U in both staging systems. Ultimately, SMS 3 and 7 achieved the highest percentage of concordance (P) of 71.7% and 66.0%, respectively, when U was performed. Combining the clinically relevant groups of SMS 3&4 and SMS 7&8 also significantly increased peak scores (SMS 3 and 4 P = 76.7%; SMS 7 and 8 P = 79.7%). The probabilities of peak scores were significantly weaker when the TOCI score was examined.
conclusionOur study shows that U can be used effectively especially to measure stages 3 and 4 and stages 7 and 8 of SMS. The U method is easy to use and therefore may offer advantages in clinical practice without the need for radiation exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.