Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38658409›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2024

Adaptive monitoring in action-what drives arthropod diversity and composition in central European beech forests?

Constanze Keye, Marcus Schmidt, Christian Roschak, Wolfgang H O Dorow, Viktor Hartung, Steffen U Pauls, Alexander Schneider, Christian Ammer, Laura Zeller, Peter Meyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Constanze KeyeDepartment for Forest Nature Conservation, Northwest German Forest Research Institute, Prof.-Oelkers-Str. 6, 34346, Hann. Münden, Germany. constanze_keye@icloud.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8465-0259
Marcus SchmidtDepartment for Forest Nature Conservation, Northwest German Forest Research Institute, Prof.-Oelkers-Str. 6, 34346, Hann. Münden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6712-6861
Christian RoschakDepartment for Forest Nature Conservation, Northwest German Forest Research Institute, Prof.-Oelkers-Str. 6, 34346, Hann. Münden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3941-7332
Wolfgang H O DorowSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6041-3494
Viktor HartungLWL-Museum of Natural History - Westphalian State Museum with Planetarium, Sentruper Str. 285, 48161, Münster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2259-508X
Steffen U PaulsSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6451-3425
Alexander SchneiderSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8451-5500
Christian AmmerDepartment of Silviculture and Forest Ecology of the Temperate Zones, University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 1, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4235-0135
Laura ZellerDepartment of Silviculture and Forest Ecology of the Temperate Zones, University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 1, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2379-0239
Peter MeyerDepartment for Forest Nature Conservation, Northwest German Forest Research Institute, Prof.-Oelkers-Str. 6, 34346, Hann. Münden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4200-4993

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture 22011418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that arthropod diversity in German forests is declining. Currently, different national programs are being developed to monitor arthropod trends and to unravel the effects of forest management on biodiversity in forests. To establish effective long-term monitoring programs, a set of drivers of arthropod diversity and composition as well as suitable species groups have to be identified. To aid in answering these questions, we investigated arthropod data collected in four Hessian forest reserves (FR) in the 1990s. To fully utilize this data set, we combined it with results from a retrospective structural sampling design applied at the original trap locations in central European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forests. As expected, the importance of the different forest structural, vegetation, and site attributes differed largely between the investigated arthropod groups: beetles, spiders, Aculeata, and true bugs. Measures related to light availability and temperature such as canopy cover or potential radiation were important to all groups affecting either richness, composition, or both. Spiders and true bugs were affected by the broadest range of explanatory variables, which makes them a good choice for monitoring general trends. For targeted monitoring focused on forestry-related effects on biodiversity, rove and ground beetles seem more suitable. Both groups were driven by a narrower, more management-related set of variables. Most importantly, our study approach shows that it is possible to utilize older biodiversity survey data. Although, in our case, there are strong restrictions due to the long time between species and structural attribute sampling.

Indexed as

ArthropodsBiodiversityEnvironmental MonitoringFagusForestsAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesForestryForest structureIndicator selectionMonitoringSpecies compositionSpecies richness

Identifiers

PMID38658409
PMCPMC11043153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.