Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38658256›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2024

Discovering mechanisms of human genetic variation and controlling cell states at scale.

Max Frenkel, Srivatsan Raman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Max FrenkelCellular and Molecular Biology Graduate Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA; Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA; Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. Electronic address: mfrenkel@wisc.edu.
Srivatsan RamanDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA; Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA; Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. Electronic address: sraman4@wisc.edu.

Funding

Institutional Training in the Genomic SciencesT32HG002760 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Qiongshi Lu · 2003 to 2026
$17.7M
Integrated Training For Physician-ScientistsT32GM140935 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Anna Huttenlocher, Jeniel E Nett · 2021 to 2026
$6.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002760NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM140935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population-scale sequencing efforts have catalogued substantial genetic variation in humans such that variant discovery dramatically outpaces interpretation. We discuss how single-cell sequencing is poised to reveal genetic mechanisms at a rate that may soon approach that of variant discovery. The functional genomics toolkit is sufficiently modular to systematically profile almost any type of variation within increasingly diverse contexts and with molecularly comprehensive and unbiased readouts. As a result, we can construct deep phenotypic atlases of variant effects that span the entire regulatory cascade. The same conceptual approach to interpreting genetic variation should be applied to engineering therapeutic cell states. In this way, variant mechanism discovery and cell state engineering will become reciprocating and iterative processes towards genomic medicine.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationSingle-Cell AnalysisGenome, HumanGenomicsHumansPhenotypecell state engineeringfunctional genomicsgenomic medicinesingle-cell sequencingvariant effect interpretation

Identifiers

PMID38658256
PMCPMC11607914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.