ArticleBMJ military health2025
'Super boots' for soldiers: theoretical ergogenic and thermoprotective benefits of energetically optimised military combat boots.
Article in BMJ military health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soldiers typically perform physically demanding tasks while wearing military uniforms and tactical footwear. New research has revealed a substantial increase of ~10% in energetic cost of walking when wearing modern combat boots versus running shoes. One approach to mitigating these costs is to follow in the footsteps of recent innovations in athletic footwear that led to the development of 'super shoes', that is, running shoes designed to lower the energetic cost of locomotion and maximise performance. We modelled the theoretical effects of optimised combat boot construction on physical performance and heat strain with the intent of spurring similarly innovative research and development of 'super boots' for soldiers. We first assessed the theoretical benefits of super boots on 2-mile run performance in a typical US Army soldier using the model developed by Kipp and colleagues. We then used the Heat Strain Decision Aid thermoregulatory model to determine the metabolic savings required for a physiologically meaningful decrease in heat strain in various scenarios. Combat boots that impart a 10% improvement in running economy would result in 7.9%-15.1% improvement in 2-mile run time, for faster to slower runners, respectively. Our thermal modelling revealed that a 10% metabolic savings would more than suffice for a 0.25°C reduction in heat strain for the vast majority of work intensities and durations in both hot-dry and hot-humid environments. These findings highlight the impact that innovative military super boots would have on physical performance and heat strain in soldiers, which could potentially maximise the likelihood of mission success in real-world scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.