ArticleNeural computation2024
Heterogeneous Forgetting Rates and Greedy Allocation in Slot-Based Memory Networks Promotes Signal Retention.
Article in Neural computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A key question in the neuroscience of memory encoding pertains to the mechanisms by which afferent stimuli are allocated within memory networks. This issue is especially pronounced in the domain of working memory, where capacity is finite. Presumably the brain must embed some "policy" by which to allocate these mnemonic resources in an online manner in order to maximally represent and store afferent information for as long as possible and without interference from subsequent stimuli. Here, we engage this question through a top-down theoretical modeling framework. We formally optimize a gating mechanism that projects afferent stimuli onto a finite number of memory slots within a recurrent network architecture. In the absence of external input, the activity in each slot attenuates over time (i.e., a process of gradual forgetting). It turns out that the optimal gating policy consists of a direct projection from sensory activity to memory slots, alongside an activity-dependent lateral inhibition. Interestingly, allocating resources myopically (greedily with respect to the current stimulus) leads to efficient utilization of slots over time. In other words, later-arriving stimuli are distributed across slots in such a way that the network state is minimally shifted and so prior signals are minimally "overwritten." Further, networks with heterogeneity in the timescales of their forgetting rates retain stimuli better than those that are more homogeneous. Our results suggest how online, recurrent networks working on temporally localized objectives without high-level supervision can nonetheless implement efficient allocation of memory resources over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.