ArticleBMJ open2024
VaNoLaH trial: a study protocol-a multinational randomised controlled trial including two identical substudies comparing vaginal versus vNOTES (vaginal natural orifice transluminal surgery) hysterectomy or laparoscopic versus vNOTES hysterectomy.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05971875 (A Multinational Randomized Controlled Trial Including Two Identical Sub Studies Comparing Vaginal Versus vNOTES), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multinational Randomized Controlled Trial Including Two Identical Sub Studies Comparing Vaginal Versus vNOTES (Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Surgery) Hysterectomy or Laparoscopic Versus vNOTES Hysterectomy.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical outcomes and postoperative sexual function after vNOTES versus TU-LESS ovarian cystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Vaginal Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery for Primary Uterovaginal Prolapse: Evidence, Evolution, and Standardized Surgical Technique for Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- ADNOLA trial: a study-protocol - a randomised controlled trial study comparing adnexal surgery by vNOTES or laparoscopy.BMJ open · 2026Article
- National implementation of vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for benign hysterectomies: A historical cohort study of Swedish data 2021-2023.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Emergency Surgical Management of Ectopic Pregnancy Using Transvaginal NOTES (vNOTES) versus Laparoscopy: A Comparative Single-Surgeon Cohort Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Why not vaginal?-Nationwide trends and surgical outcomes in low-risk hysterectomies: A retrospective cohort study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for tubal ectopic pregnancy(vNOTESTEP): a protocol for a randomized controlled trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Intra- and Postoperative Complications in 4565 vNOTES Hysterectomies: International Registry Cohort Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHysterectomy is one of the most common surgeries performed in women. Minimally invasive methods are on the rise globally as they have been shown to decrease surgical morbidity compared with abdominal hysterectomy. Hysterectomy by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is the latest innovation. It combines the vaginal approach and endoscopy via the vagina. Large pragmatic randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are lacking comparing outcomes after vNOTES, vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH).
methodsMulticentre pragmatic RCT aiming to recruit 1000 women aged 18-75 years undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease. The RCT includes two identical substudies (groups A and B). If VH is considered safe and feasible, the patient will be randomised within group A (VH vs vNOTES). If VH is not considered safe or feasible, patients will be randomised within group B (LH vs vNOTES). ANALYSIS: Primary outcome is the proportion of women leaving the hospital within 12 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes are hospitalisation time, conversion rates, duration of the surgical procedure, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications and readmission. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Ethical Board Committee at Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium, has approved the research protocol 230704 (principal investigator). Before including patients, all centres will require local or national ethical approval. The results of the study will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05971875.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.