Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38657567›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

Large language models for biomedicine: foundations, opportunities, challenges, and best practices.

Satya S Sahoo, Joseph M Plasek, Hua Xu, Özlem Uzuner, Trevor Cohen, Meliha Yetisgen, Hongfang Liu, Stéphane Meystre, Yanshan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluating NLP Approaches to Extract Drug Indications.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Satya S SahooDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44122, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9190-4256
Joseph M PlasekDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02115, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9686-3876
Hua XuSection of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-4672
Özlem UzunerDepartment of Information Sciences and Technology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8011-9850
Trevor CohenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, United States.
Meliha YetisgenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, United States.
Hongfang LiuDepartment of Health Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Stéphane MeystreDipartimento tecnologie innovative, Institute of Digital Technologies for Personalised Healthcare, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, 6962, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7632-9625
Yanshan WangDepartment of Health Information Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States.

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001857 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2016 to 2025
$129.3M
Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR002548 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCOMSEY, GRACE A · 2018 to 2022
$35.5M
Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of Northern Ohio, Catalyzing Linkages to Equity in Health (CLE Health)UM1TR004528 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GRACE A MCCOMSEY · 2023 to 2026
$32.1M
Neuroscience Gateway to Enable Dissemination of Computational And Data Processing Tools And Software.U24EB029005 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MAJUMDAR, AMITAVA · 2019 to 2023
$2.2M
DeconDTN: Deconfounding Deep Transformer Networks for Clinical NLPR01LM014056 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI COHEN, TREVOR, PAKHOMOV, SERGUEI VS · 2022 to 2025
$1.7M
CRCNS:NeuroBridge: Connecting Big Data for Reproducible Clinical NeuroscienceR01DA053028 · NIDA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI AMBITE, JOSE LUIS, RAJASEKAR, ARCOT · 2020 to 2023
$1.7M
Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandDravet Syndrome FoundationNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Clinical and Translational Science UL1TR002548NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002548NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004528NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA053028NIHNIH HHS U24EB029005NIH HHS UL1TR001857NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014056US Department of Defense W81XWH2110859US National Institutes of Health U24EB029005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGenerative large language models (LLMs) are a subset of transformers-based neural network architecture models. LLMs have successfully leveraged a combination of an increased number of parameters, improvements in computational efficiency, and large pre-training datasets to perform a wide spectrum of natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Using a few examples (few-shot) or no examples (zero-shot) for prompt-tuning has enabled LLMs to achieve state-of-the-art performance in a broad range of NLP applications. This article by the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) NLP Working Group characterizes the opportunities, challenges, and best practices for our community to leverage and advance the integration of LLMs in downstream NLP applications effectively. This can be accomplished through a variety of approaches, including augmented prompting, instruction prompt tuning, and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). TARGET AUDIENCE: Our focus is on making LLMs accessible to the broader biomedical informatics community, including clinicians and researchers who may be unfamiliar with NLP. Additionally, NLP practitioners may gain insight from the described best practices. SCOPE: We focus on 3 broad categories of NLP tasks, namely natural language understanding, natural language inferencing, and natural language generation. We review the emerging trends in prompt tuning, instruction fine-tuning, and evaluation metrics used for LLMs while drawing attention to several issues that impact biomedical NLP applications, including falsehoods in generated text (confabulation/hallucinations), toxicity, and dataset contamination leading to overfitting. We also review potential approaches to address some of these current challenges in LLMs, such as chain of thought prompting, and the phenomena of emergent capabilities observed in LLMs that can be leveraged to address complex NLP challenge in biomedical applications.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingNeural Networks, ComputerHumansMedical Informaticsclinical natural language processinglarge language modelsmedical informatics applicationstransfer learningtransformer neural networks

Identifiers

PMID38657567
PMCPMC11339493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.