ArticleACS biomaterials science & engineering2024
Modulating Lipid-Polymer Nanoparticles' Physicochemical Properties to Alter Macrophage Uptake.
Article in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bone-seeking nanomaterials for rebalancing bone remodeling in osteoporosis.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
- Surface hydrophobicity and rigidity determines protein corona on orally delivered nanoparticles treating colitis.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Engineering macrophages for cancer immunotherapy: emerging insights and therapeutic potential.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Emerging nanotechnology-enabled siRNA oral delivery platforms.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2026Review
- Nanomaterial-Enabled Modulation of Tumor-Associated Macrophages and Dendritic Cells to Enhance Cancer Immunotherapy.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Polyethyleneimine-modifiedMaterials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Inflammation: a matter of immune cell life and death.npj biomedical innovations · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Macrophage uptake of nanoparticles is highly dependent on the physicochemical characteristics of those nanoparticles. Here, we have created a collection of lipid-polymer nanoparticles (LPNPs) varying in size, stiffness, and lipid makeup to determine the effects of these factors on uptake in murine bone marrow-derived macrophages. The LPNPs varied in diameter from 232 to 812 nm, in storage modulus from 21.2 to 287 kPa, and in phosphatidylserine content from 0 to 20%. Stiff, large nanoparticles with a coating containing phosphatidylserine were taken up by macrophages to a much higher degree than any other formulation (between 9.3× and 166× higher than other LPNPs). LPNPs with phosphatidylserine were taken up most by M2-polarized macrophages, while those without were taken up most by M1-polarized macrophages. Differences in total LPNP uptake were not dependent on endocytosis pathway(s) other than phagocytosis. This work acts as a basis for understanding how the interactions between nanoparticle physicochemical characteristics may act synergistically to facilitate particle uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.