ReviewClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2024
Gene Expression Assays to Tailor Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer.
Review in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcriptome-Based Synthetic Lethality Predictions to Improve Targeted Therapy/Immunotherapy Treatment Prioritization in Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer: BC-SELECT.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- Optimizing Extended Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Early HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer: The Emerging Role of Genomic Assays and ctDNA MRD.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Risk of Recurrence in Patients with HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer: A Podcast.Targeted oncology · 2026Article
- The MHCII Immune Activation Score predicts risk of recurrence and benefit of taxanes in Basallike and HER2-enriched breast cancer.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Deep learning model for noninvasive prediction of Ki-67 expression and prognostic stratification in breast cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.European radiology · 2026Article
- Baseline gene expression and dynamic endocrine therapy use in ER+ breast cancer: associations with recurrence in a real-world cohort.Research square · 2026Article
- Optimizing transcriptome-based synthetic lethality predictions to improve targeted therapy / immunotherapy treatment prioritization in non-metastatic breast cancer: BC-SELECT.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Identification of racial disparities across MammaPrint and BluePrint subtypes in HR + HER2- breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Basal-like HR + /HER2- breast cancers show higher tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and immune signatures with potential therapeutic implications.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- Clinical relevance of clinical treatment score post-5 years (CTS5) in HR-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- Correlation between histopathological features and recurrence score according to menopausal status in HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients: a retrospective study.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025Article
- Development of a Mitochondrial Membrane Permeability Transition Prognosis System in Colon Adenocarcinoma: Risk Stratification and Therapeutic Target Identification.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Contemporary Issues in Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: A Brief Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) represents the standard of care for almost all hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- breast cancers, and different agents and durations are currently available. In this context, the tailoring and optimization of adjuvant endocrine treatment by reducing unnecessary toxic treatment while taking into account the biological heterogeneity of HR+/HER2- breast cancer represents a clinical priority. There is therefore a significant need for the integration of biological biomarkers in the choice of adjuvant ET beyond currently used clinicopathological characteristics. Several gene expression assays have been developed to identify patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer who will not derive benefit from the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy. By enhancing risk stratification and predicting therapeutic response, genomic assays have also shown to be a promising tool for optimizing endocrine treatment decisions. In this study, we review evidence supporting the use of most common commercially available gene expression assays [Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, Breast Cancer Index (BCI), Prosigna, and EndoPredict] in tailoring adjuvant ET. Available data on the use of genomic tests to inform extended adjuvant treatment choice based on the risk of late relapse and on the estimated benefit of a prolonged ET are discussed. Moreover, preliminary evidence regarding the use of genomic assays to inform de-escalation of endocrine treatment, such as shorter durations or omission, for low-risk patients is reviewed. Overall, gene expression assays are emerging as potential tools to further personalize adjuvant treatment for patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.