Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38656776›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2024

Validating the Effectiveness of the Patient-Centered Cancer Care Framework by Assessing the Impact of Work System Factors on Patient-Centered Care and Quality of Care: Interview Study With Newly Diagnosed Cancer Patients.

Safa Elkefi, Onur Asan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predictors of Treatment Preparedness Among Lung Cancer Patients: The Role of Patient-Provider Communication.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Safa ElkefiSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4293-0404
Onur AsanSchool of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9239-3723
Columbia University · USStevens Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Patients Perceptions of Electronic Health Record use during initial oncology outpatient clinic visitsR15NR018965 · NINR · THE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ASAN, ONUR · 2020 to 2020
$431k
NINR NIH HHS R15 NR018965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with cancer who have recently been diagnosed have distinct requirements compared to cancer survivors. It is crucial to take into account their unique needs to ensure that they make informed decisions and are receptive to the care provided.

objectiveThis study suggested a framework titled Effectiveness of Patient-Centered Cancer Care that considers the needs of newly diagnosed patients with cancer and related work system factors. This study investigated how work system factors influence the perceptions of patient-centered care, quality of care, and associated outcomes among newly diagnosed patients with cancer. Patient-centered care is defined in terms of workload and communication considerations, whereas the quality of care is assessed through indicators such as trust in physicians, satisfaction with care, and perceptions of technology.

methodsThis study used qualitative data collected through interviews with newly diagnosed patients with cancer (N=20) right after their first visits with their physicians. Thematic analysis was conducted to validate the 5 hypotheses of the framework, mapping the interactions among quality of care, patient-centered care, and work system factors.

resultsWe found that workload and patient-centered communication impact the quality of care and that the work system elements impact the patient-centeredness (workload and communication) and the quality of care (trust in physicians, satisfaction with care, and perception of technology use).

conclusionsQualitatively validating the proposed Effectiveness of Patient-Centered Cancer Care framework, this study demonstrated its efficacy in elucidating the interplay of various factors. The framework holds promise for informing interventions geared toward enhancing patients' experiences during their initial visits after diagnosis. There is a pressing need for heightened attention to the organizational design, patient processes, and collaborative efforts among diverse stakeholders and providers to optimize the overall patient experience.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPatient-Centered CareQualitative ResearchQuality of Health CareAdultAgedCommunicationFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionWorkloadcancercommunicationsatisfactiontechnologytrustworkloadwork system factors

Identifiers

PMID38656776
PMCPMC11079762
OpenAlexW4392868019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.