ArticleActa neurochirurgica2024
Endovascular thrombectomy for treatment of isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion: a real-world analysis of hospitalizations in the United States.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endovascular Therapy Versus Best Medical Treatment in Posterior Cerebral Artery Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Endovascular therapy versus medical management in posterior cerebral artery stroke: neurological gains without functional superiority: a meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite renewed interest and recently demonstrated efficacy for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) of the posterior circulation, to date, no randomized clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate EVT for isolated occlusions of the posterior cerebral artery (IPCA).
methodsHospitalizations for adult patients with primary admission diagnoses of IPCA occlusion were identified in the National Inpatient Sample registry during the period of 2016-2020. The study exposure was treatment with EVT, and primary clinical endpoints included favorable functional outcome (defined as discharge disposition to home without services, previously shown to have high concordance with modified Rankin scale scores 0-2), in-hospital mortality, and any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed to balance baseline clinical characteristics between those receiving EVT or medical management (MM).
resultsThis analysis identified 34,880 IPCA occlusion hospitalizations, 730 (2.1%) of which documented treatment with EVT. Following IPTW adjustment, EVT was associated with favorable outcome in IPCA patients presenting with mild deficits (M-D) (NIHSS < 6) [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.27, 2.45; p < 0.001] and in those presenting with moderate-to-severe deficits (M-S-D) (NIHSS 6-42) (aOR 2.00, 95% CI 1.86, 2.15; p < 0.001). Mortality rates did not differ among those with M-S-D [EVT 4.8% vs. MM 4.7%, p = 0.742], while ICH rates were lower.
conclusionRetrospective analysis of a large administrative registry in the Unites States demonstrates an association of EVT with favorable outcomes following IPCA occlusion, without concomitant risk of hemorrhagic transformation or mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.