Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38656706›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2024

Evaluation of ChatGPT and Gemini large language models for pharmacometrics with NONMEM.

Euibeom Shin, Yifan Yu, Robert R Bies, Murali Ramanathan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Context Engineering for AI-Assisted Pharmacometrics: A Practical Tutorial.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Using ChatGPT to Solve Clinical Radiobiology Problems.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Scoping review of the role of pharmacometrics in model-informed drug development.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. AI In Action: Redefining Drug Discovery and Development.Clinical and translational science · 2025
    Article
  17. State of Art of Dose Individualization to Support tacrolimus drug monitoring: What's Next?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Euibeom ShinDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 14214-8033, USA.
Yifan YuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 14214-8033, USA.
Robert R BiesDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 14214-8033, USA.
Murali RamanathanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 14214-8033, USA. Murali@Buffalo.Edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess ChatGPT 4.0 (ChatGPT) and Gemini Ultra 1.0 (Gemini) large language models on NONMEM coding tasks relevant to pharmacometrics and clinical pharmacology. ChatGPT and Gemini were assessed on tasks mimicking real-world applications of NONMEM. The tasks ranged from providing a curriculum for learning NONMEM, an overview of NONMEM code structure to generating code. Prompts in lay language to elicit NONMEM code for a linear pharmacokinetic (PK) model with oral administration and a more complex model with two parallel first-order absorption mechanisms were investigated. Reproducibility and the impact of "temperature" hyperparameter settings were assessed. The code was reviewed by two NONMEM experts. ChatGPT and Gemini provided NONMEM curriculum structures combining foundational knowledge with advanced concepts (e.g., covariate modeling and Bayesian approaches) and practical skills including NONMEM code structure and syntax. ChatGPT provided an informative summary of the NONMEM control stream structure and outlined the key NONMEM Translator (NM-TRAN) records needed. ChatGPT and Gemini were able to generate code blocks for the NONMEM control stream from the lay language prompts for the two coding tasks. The control streams contained focal structural and syntax errors that required revision before they could be executed without errors and warnings. The code output from ChatGPT and Gemini was not reproducible, and varying the temperature hyperparameter did not reduce the errors and omissions substantively. Large language models may be useful in pharmacometrics for efficiently generating an initial coding template for modeling projects. However, the output can contain errors and omissions that require correction.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremComputer SimulationHumansModels, BiologicalNonlinear DynamicsPharmacokineticsPharmacology, ClinicalReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareArtificial intelligenceChatGPTDrug DevelopmentGenerative AIModelingNonlinear mixed effectsNONMEMPharmacokineticsPharmacometrics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.