ArticleEJNMMI physics2024
Quantification of biochemical PSA dynamics after radioligand therapy with [
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeted Alpha Therapy: Exploring the Clinical Insights into [225Ac]Ac-PSMA and Its Relevance Compared with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA in Advanced Prostate Cancer Management.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Population pharmacokinetic modeling in radiopharmaceutical therapy: a review.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2025Review
- Patient-specific prostate tumour growth simulation: a first step towards the digital twin.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is an unmet need for prediction of treatment outcome or patient selection for [
methodsA population PK model was developed using quantitative SPECT/CT data (406 scans) of 76 patients who received multiple cycles [
resultsThe population PK model adequately described observed data in all compartments (based on visual inspection of goodness-of-fit plots) with adequate precision of parameters estimates (< 36.1% relative standard error (RSE)). A significant declining uptake in tumors (k
conclusionsOur population PK model accurately described observed [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.