ArticleJournal of fluorescence2025
Observing Variation in Whispering Gallery Mode Resonance of a Trapped and Levitated Dye Doped Microdrop.
Article in Journal of fluorescence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whispering gallery mode (WGM) resonance was created in a spherical micro drop. A gradual shift in the resonance were observed. For a 600 nm droplet radius, the blue shift were 1.5, 0.7, 3.7 nm. It was estimated that such a shift corresponds to a reduction in optical radius of the droplet by 1.3, 0.6, 3.3 nm respectively. The droplet was created from a solution of glycerol, methanol and rhodamine 6G dye, and was trapped and levitated in a modified Paul trap. The WGMs were created by optically exciting the dye material from an external 532 nm cw laser beam. A shift in the WGM was observed during a gradual increase in power of the excitation laser, and a reason for such a shift was thought to be thermal evaporation of the liquid. For a larger droplet an initial 0.1 nm thermal expansion was also estimated, preceding the volume contraction. Such an expansion was negligible for a smaller droplet. The rate of change of the blue shift depends upon initial radius of the droplet. For the smaller droplet the estimated rate of change of WGM with a change in optical radius, was 0.771. For larger droplet, this rate is lower.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.