Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38656631›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2024

755-nm picosecond laser plus topical 20% azelaic acid compared to topical 20% azelaic acid alone for the treatment of melasma: a randomized, split-face and controlled trial.

Dihui Lai, Shaowei Cheng, Shaona Zhou, Jianchun Hao, Hongguang Chen, Kang Jia, Hongmei Liu, Yong Cui

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Azelaic Acid: Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Applications.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dihui LaiDepartment of Dermatology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, NO.2 Yinghua East Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Shaowei ChengDepartment of Dermatology, Chui Yang Liu Hospital Affiliated to Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Shaona ZhouDepartment of Dermatology, Chui Yang Liu Hospital Affiliated to Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Jianchun HaoDepartment of Dermatology, Chui Yang Liu Hospital Affiliated to Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Hongguang ChenInstitute of Mental Health, Peking University Sixth Hospital, Beijing, China.
Kang JiaDepartment of Dermatology, MEIYAN Aesthetic Plastic Medical Clinic, Beijing, China.
Hongmei LiuDepartment of Dermatology, MEIYAN Aesthetic Plastic Medical Clinic, Beijing, China.
Yong CuiDepartment of Dermatology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, NO.2 Yinghua East Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China. wuhucuiyong@vip.163.com.
Tsinghua University · CNPlastic Surgery Hospital · CNPeking University Sixth Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMelasma remains a refractory skin condition that needs to be actively explored. Azelaic acid has been used for decades as a topical agent to improve melasma through multiple mechanisms, however, there is a lack of research on its combination with laser therapy. This study evaluated the effectiveness of isolated treatment with topical 20% azelaic acid and its combination with 755-nm picosecond laser in facial melasma patients.

methodsA randomized, evaluator-blinded, controlled study was conducted on 30 subjects with facial melasma in a single center from October 2021 to April 2022. All subjects received topical 20% azelaic acid cream (AA) for 24 weeks, and after 4 weeks, a hemiface was randomly assigned to receive 755-nm picosecond (PS) laser therapy once every 4 weeks for 3 treatments. Treatment efficacy was determined by mMASI score evaluations, dermoscopic assessment, reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) assessments and patient's satisfaction assessments (PSA).

resultsTreatment with 20% azelaic acid, with or without picosecond laser therapy, significantly reduced the hemi-mMASI score (P < 0.0001) and resulted in higher patient satisfaction. Improvements in dermoscopic and RCM assessments were observed in both sides of the face over time, with no difference between the two sides. RCM exhibited better dentritic cell improvement in the combined treatment side. No patients had serious adverse effects at the end of treatment or during the follow-up period.

conclusionThe additional use of picosecond laser therapy showed no clinical difference except for subtle differences detected by RCM assessments.The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100051294; 18 September 2021).

Indexed as

Dicarboxylic AcidsLasers, Solid-StateMelanosisAdministration, TopicalAdultCombined Modality TherapyDermatologic AgentsFemaleHumansLow-Level Light TherapyMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionSingle-Blind MethodTreatment Outcomeazelaic acidDermatologic AgentsDicarboxylic AcidsAzelaic acidDermoscopyMelasmaPicosecond laserReflectance confocal microscopy

Identifiers

PMID38656631
OpenAlexW4395111628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.