SynthesisGlycoconjugate journal2024
Identification of drug responsible glycogene signature in liver carcinoma from meta-analysis using RNA-seq data.
Synthesis in Glycoconjugate journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- A newly identified pathology of episodic angioedema with hypereosinophilia (Gleich syndrome) revealed by nultiomics analysis.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glycans have attracted much attention in cancer therapeutic strategies, and cell surface proteins and lipids with glycans are known to be altered during the carcinogenic process. However, our understanding of how the glycogenes profile responds to drug stimulation remains incomplete. In this study, we search public databases for Sequence Read Archive data on drug-treated liver cancer cells, with the aim to comprehensively analyze the drug responses of glycogenes via bioinformatic meta-analysis. The study comprised 86 datasets, encompassing eight distinct liver cancer cell lines and 13 different drugs. Differentially expressed genes were quantified, and 399 glycogenes were identified. The glycogenes signature was then analyzed using bioinformatics methodologies. In the Protein-protein interaction network analysis, we identified drug-responsive glycogenes such as Beta-1,4-Galactosyltransferase 1, GDP-Mannose 4,6-Dehydratase, UDP-Glucose Ceramide Glucosyltransferase, and Solute Carrier Family 2 Member 4 as key glycan biomarkers. In the enrichment analysis using the pathway list of glycogenes, the results also demonstrated that drug stimulation resulted in alterations to glycopathway-related genes involved in several processes, namely O-Mannosylation, POMGNT2 Type, Capping, Heparan Sulfate Sulfation, and Glucuronidation pathways. These genes and pathways commonly exhibit variable expression across multiple liver cancer cells in response to the same drug, making them potential targets for new cancer therapies. In addition to their primary roles, drugs may also participate in the regulation of glycans. The insights from this study could pave the way for the development of liver cancer therapies that target the regulation of gene profiles involved in the biosynthesis of glycans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.