Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38656462›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2024

Enhancing Oncologists' Comfort with Serious Illness Conversations: The Impact of Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG) Training.

E Adaji, M Johnson, M C George, N Nortjé

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E AdajiOffice of Patient Experience, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. eqadaji@mdanderson.org.ORCID 0009-0000-5580-942X
M JohnsonOffice of Patient Experience, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-5596-3407
M C GeorgeDepartment of Hospital Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4888-5982
N NortjéDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3660-2762

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providers oftentimes need to have difficult conversations with patients facing a poor prognosis. Research indicates that providers generally feel ill prepared for these conversations and that bad conversations may lead to more anxiety for patients. Communication skills development training programs have shown improvement in providers' skills. Our cancer center embarked on skills development training to help providers improve their skills and comfort in having serious illness conversations. During our phased approach, about 500 physicians and advanced practice providers in the Division of Oncology were trained for over a year. Their level of comfort with serious illness conversations was measured before and after the training by using both quantitative and qualitative methods. We found that mean and median comfort scores increased from pre-training to post-training. The findings suggest that the improved comfort and confidence observed among providers who undergo communications skills training can lead to better provider-patient communication, more patient-centered care, and improved patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

CommunicationOncologistsPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansMaleMedical OncologyMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatient-Centered CarePatient SatisfactionEnd-of-life conversationSerious illnessSerious illness conversationSICG

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.