ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2024
Fluorescent carbon dots for labeling of bacteria: mechanism and prospects-a review.
Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Progress on Carbon-Dots-Based Probes for Microbial Labeling and Versatile Analysis Applications.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Tailoring Carbon Quantum Dots via Precursor Engineering for Fluorescence-Based Biosensing ofBiosensors · 2025Review
- Three-way junction structure-mediated reverse transcription-free exponential amplification reaction for pathogen RNA detection.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The search for bacteria-labeling agents that are more efficient and less toxic compared to existing staining dyes is ongoing. Fluorescent quantum dots and carbon dots (CDs) have been extensively researched for various bioimaging applications. Priority is given to CDs due to several advantages, including lower toxicity, versatility in tuning their properties, and better photostability compared to metal-based quantum dots. Although significant progress is still needed to replace existing dyes with CDs for bacteria labeling, they offer promising potential for further improvement in efficiency. Surface charges and functional groups have been reported as decisive factors for bacterial discrimination and live/dead assays; however, a complete guideline for preparing CDs with optimum properties for efficient staining and predicting their labeling performance is lacking. In this review, we discuss the application of fluorescent CDs for bacterial labeling and the underlying mechanisms and principles. We primarily focus on the application and mechanism of CDs for Gram differentiation, live imaging, live/dead bacteria differentiation, bacterial viability testing, biofilm imaging, and the challenges associated with application of CDs. Based on proposed mechanisms of bacterial labeling and ambiguous results reported, we provide our view and guidelines for the researchers in this field to overcome the challenges associated with bacteria labeling using fluorescent CDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38656364What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.