Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38656344›Full record

ArticleRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Imaging of congenital heart defects with a focus on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography].

Diane Miriam Renz, Joachim Böttcher, Jan Eckstein, Carolin Huisinga, Alexander Pfeil, Christian Lücke, Matthias Gutberlet

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06752187 (Diagnostic Values of MRI in Congenital Heart Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06752187 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Diagnostic Values of MRI in Congenital Heart Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled55ConditionsCongenital Heart Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Diane Miriam RenzInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Arbeitsbereich Kinderradiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. renz.diane@mh-hannover.de.
Joachim BöttcherFriedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Deutschland.
Jan EcksteinInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Arbeitsbereich Kinderradiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Carolin HuisingaInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Arbeitsbereich Kinderradiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Alexander PfeilKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland.
Christian LückeAbteilung für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universität Leipzig - Herzzentrum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Matthias GutberletAbteilung für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universität Leipzig - Herzzentrum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical issueDue to advances in diagnostics and therapy, the survival rate of patients with congenital heart defects is continuously increasing. The aim of this review is to compare various imaging modalities that are used in the diagnosis of congenital heart defects.

methodsTransthoracic echocardiography is the imaging method of choice in the presence of a congenital heart defect because of its wide availability and non-invasiveness. It can be complemented by transesophageal echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the heart and vessels close to the heart. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: The radiation exposure of CT examinations of the heart is continuously decreasing because of improved technologies. MRI is also being continuously optimized, e.g., by the acquisition of MR angiographies without contrast medium application or a thin three-dimensional (3D) visualization of the entire heart with the possibility of reconstruction in all spatial planes (whole-heart technique) as well as 2D to 4D flow. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATION: Due to the complexity of congenital heart defects and the variety of possible pathologies, the choice of imaging modality and its exact performance has to be coordinated in an interdisciplinary context and individually adapted.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedChildHumansInfantAortic isthmus stenosisChildrenCongenital heart diseaseFontan circulationTetralogy of Fallot

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.