Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38656186›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2024

How to use meropenem in pediatric patients undergoing CKRT? Integrated meropenem pharmacokinetic model for critically ill children.

Laura Butragueño-Laiseca, Iñaki F Troconiz, Santiago Grau, Nuria Campillo, Belén Padilla, Sarah Nicole Fernández, María Slöcker, Laura Herrera, María José Santiago

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Laura Butragueño-LaisecaPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Iñaki F TroconizPharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Santiago GrauPharmacy Department, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Nuria CampilloPharmacy Department, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Belén PadillaClinical Microbiology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Sarah Nicole FernándezPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
María SlöckerPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Laura HerreraPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
María José SantiagoPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8149-1179
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESNavarre Institute of Health Research · ES

Funding

MEC | Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) PI20/01428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard dosing could fail to achieve adequate systemic concentrations in ICU children or may lead to toxicity in children with acute kidney injury. The population pharmacokinetic analysis was used to simultaneously analyze all available data (plasma, prefilter, postfilter, effluent, and urine concentrations) and provide the pharmacokinetic characteristics of meropenem. The probability of target fT > MIC attainment, avoiding toxic levels, during the entire dosing interval was estimated by simulation of different intermittent and continuous infusions in the studied population. A total of 16 critically ill children treated with meropenem were included, with 7 of them undergoing continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT). Only 33% of children without CKRT achieved 90% of the time when the free drug concentration exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT > MIC) for an MIC of 2 mg/L. In dose simulations, only continuous infusions (60-120 mg/kg in a 24-h infusion) reached the objective in patients <30 kg. In patients undergoing CKRT, the currently used schedule (40 mg/kg/12 h from day 2 in a short infusion of 30 min) was clearly insufficient in patients <30 kg. Keeping the dose to 40 mg/kg q8h without applying renal adjustment and extended infusions (40 mg/kg in 3- or 4-h infusion every 12 h) was sufficient to reach 90% fT > MIC (>2 mg/L) in patients >10 kg. In patients <10 kg, only continuous infusions reached the objective. In patients >30 kg, 60 mg/kg in a 24-h infusion is sufficient and avoids toxicity. This population model could help with an individualized dosing approach that needs to be adopted in critically ill pediatric patients. Critically ill patients subjected to or not to CKRT may benefit from the administration of meropenem in an extended or continuous infusion.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsContinuous Renal Replacement TherapyCritical IllnessMeropenemMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAcute Kidney InjuryAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfusions, IntravenousMaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsMeropenemacute kidney injurycontinuous kidney replacement therapycontinuous renal replacement therapycritically ill childrendose individualizationmeropenempopulation pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID38656186
PMCPMC11620509
OpenAlexW4395116784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.