Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38656005›Full record

ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2024

Predictors of recurrence in breast cancer patients with pathological partial response.

Fadime Didem Can Trabulus, Mehmet Ali Nazli, Esra Arslan, Ozlem Mermut, Fatih Dal, Bulent Akce, Riza Umar Gursu, Esra Canan Kelten Talu, Jacqueline Nur Adira Couteau

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fadime Didem Can TrabulusBahçeşehir University, School of Medicine, Goztepe Medical Park Hospital, Department of General Surgery - İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1687-715X
Mehmet Ali NazliUniversity of Health Sciences, Istanbul Training and Education Hospital, Department of Radiology - İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4605-7822
Esra ArslanUniversity of Health Sciences, Istanbul Training and Education Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine - İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9222-8883
Ozlem MermutUniversity of Health Sciences, Istanbul Training and Education Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology - İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5449-7361
Fatih DalUniversity of Health Sciences, Istanbul Training and Education Hospital, Department of General Surgery - İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9768-8125
Bulent AkceUniversity of Health Sciences, Istanbul Training and Education Hospital, Department of General Surgery - İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0275-1882
Riza Umar GursuUniversity of Health Sciences, Istanbul Training and Education Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology - İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6331-3632
Esra Canan Kelten TaluUniversity of Health Sciences, İzmir Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology - İzmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8767-4275
Jacqueline Nur Adira CouteauBahçeşehir University, School of Medicine - İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-9584-9266
Izmir University · TRBahçeşehir University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePatients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a relative risk of developing recurrence. This study investigates the risk factors for recurrence in locally advanced breast cancer patients with residual disease and evaluates survival analysis.

methodsThis is a retrospective, single-center study. Breast cancer patients who failed to achieve a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included. Demographic, clinicopathological, and treatment characteristics were evaluated to identify predictive factors of recurrence and survival analysis.

resultsWe included 205 patients in this study. After a median of 31 months of follow-up, 10 patients died, and 20 developed distant metastasis. Disease-free survival and disease-specific survival were 73.8% and 83.1%, respectively. Lymphovascular invasion and non-luminal subtype were independent predictors of locoregional recurrence. In situ carcinoma, lymphovascular invasion, ypTIII stage, and non-luminal molecular subtypes were independent predictors of disease-free survival. The only independent factor affecting disease-specific survival was cNII-III. The number of involved lymph nodes was an independent predictor of disease-free survival in patients without complete axillary response.

conclusionFactors affecting disease-specific survival and disease-free survival were cNII-III and the number of involved lymph nodes, respectively. Patients with non-luminal, large residual tumors with in situ carcinoma, lymphovascular invasion, clinically positive axilla, and residual nodal involvement have a high relative risk for recurrence and may benefit from additional treatments.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID38656005
PMCPMC11042820
OpenAlexW4395466857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.